Live Exposure Defense: From CVE to Confirmed Exposure in 12 Hours – See more

New CVE Detected

CVE-2026-69217 – HTTP Request Smuggling – http4s Ember Server (< 0.23.35 / 1.0.0-M1–M46)

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge:

Summary

CVE-2026-69217 is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in the Ember server component of http4s, a Scala HTTP library. The Ember HTTP/1.1 parser accepts requests containing duplicate Content-Length headers with differing values and uses the last value instead of rejecting the message as required by RFC 9112, allowing attackers to smuggle requests past front-end proxies and load balancers. The issue has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.7 (High).

Technical details

  • Root cause: Ember’s HTTP/1.1 request parser does not enforce RFC 9112 §6.3, which mandates that a server respond with 400 Bad Request and close the connection when it encounters multiple Content-Length headers with conflicting values. Instead, Ember accepts the request and uses the last supplied value to determine body length.
  • Trigger conditions: An attacker sends a crafted HTTP/1.1 request containing two or more Content-Length headers with differing values to a deployment where http4s Ember sits behind an intermediary (reverse proxy, load balancer, CDN) that interprets the duplicate headers differently (e.g., using the first value instead of the last, or vice versa) — a classic CL.CL desynchronization scenario.
  • Attack vector: Network-based (AV:N), no authentication or user interaction required, but requires high attack complexity (AC:H) since exploitation depends on the specific behavior of the front-end intermediary relative to Ember.
  • Impact: Successful exploitation can allow an attacker to bypass front-end security controls, hijack other users’ requests (potentially capturing cookies, authorization tokens, or other sensitive headers), poison shared proxy/CDN caches, and in client-side deployments (via a malicious upstream server) affect shared proxy configurations. The vulnerability carries a Scope Changed rating with high confidentiality and integrity impact; there is no availability impact.

Affected software

  • http4s-ember-core (and dependent Ember server modules) for Scala 2.12, 2.13, and 3:
    • Versions ≤ 0.23.34
    • Versions 1.0.0-M1 through 1.0.0-M46

Severity

  • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 8.7 (High)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
  • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ("HTTP Request/Response Smuggling")

Mitigation and recommended actions

  • Immediate: Upgrade http4s Ember to version 0.23.35 (0.x line) or 1.0.0-M47 (1.0.0 milestone line) or later, both of which reject requests containing duplicate, conflicting Content-Length headers.
  • If immediate patching is not possible:
    • Deploy or configure a strictly RFC 9112-compliant reverse proxy/load balancer in front of Ember that itself rejects requests with duplicate or conflicting Content-Length headers, preventing desynchronization before requests reach the application.
    • Audit front-end intermediaries (CDNs, load balancers, API gateways) for consistent, spec-compliant handling of duplicate Content-Length headers to eliminate interpretation mismatches.
    • Monitor for anomalous requests containing multiple Content-Length headers as a potential indicator of smuggling attempts.

References

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

How IONIX’s External Exposure Management Platform Detects and Validates
Zero-Days to Shrink MTTR

1

Map your entire attack surface (continously)

IONIX uses multi-factor discovery methods, including DNS analysis, certificate mapping, metadata inspection, and more, to automatically map every internet-facing asset across your environment. This includes cloud instances, third-party platforms, shadow IT, and even forgotten infrastructure that traditional tools miss.

2

Monitor for new CVEs

Dozens of threat intel feeds using agentic technology are continuously analyzed to detect the appearance of proof-of-concept code, exploit kits, and indicators of active targeting. IONIX goes further by applying AI to proactively evaluate whether emerging vulnerabilities are likely to be exploited, even before PoCs go public.

3

Identify Potential External Exposures

Not all CVEs matter. IONIX filters vulnerabilities by asking attacker-centric questions: Can it be reached from the internet? Does it require authentication? Is it being exploited in the wild? This dramatically reduces noise and focuses teams on threats that can actually be weaponized.

4

Create Safe, Scalable Exploit Validations

IONIX transforms real-world PoCs into safe, non-intrusive test payloads that can be run in production environments without disruption. These simulations are precisely targeted to the systems that are vulnerable, ensuring rapid validation without unnecessary load.

5

Execute Exploit Validations

By combining context about software stack, versioning, exposure status, and reachability, IONIX ensures that only the right payloads are executed against the right assets, maximizing efficiency and minimizing risk.

6

Drive Fast and Actionable Remediation

Results are routed through integrations with ticketing, SOAR, and SIEM tools. Issues are written in plain language, bundled into remediation clusters, and prioritized based on asset criticality, exploitability, and blast radius. This shortens mean time to remediation (MTTR) and empowers teams to act with confidence.

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

Subscribe to Threat Center RSS

Copy/paste the link below into your preferred RSS reader or follow these instructions to subscribe to Slack alerts.

Get Real-Time CVE Alerts to Your Email

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge