Live Exposure Defense: From CVE to Confirmed Exposure in 12 Hours – See more

New CVE Detected

CVE-2026-93592 – Denial of Service (GPU Context Corruption) – vLLM before 0.28.0

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge:

Summary

CVE-2026-93592 is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in vLLM, the widely used open-source library for serving large language models. Versions prior to 0.28.0 fail to validate the lower bound of token IDs submitted to the /v1/embeddings and /pooling endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to send a single crafted request containing a negative token ID and crash the entire inference engine. The flaw carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.7 (High), reflecting network exploitability with no authentication or user interaction required.

Technical details

  • Root cause: vLLM’s token validation logic checks only the upper bound of token IDs against the model’s vocabulary size, but never checks that IDs are non-negative (CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index).
  • Trigger conditions: An attacker submits a request to /v1/embeddings or /pooling with a negative integer as a token ID. Because negative values pass validation, they are used directly as an index into the embedding table on the GPU.
  • Attack vector: Network-based, unauthenticated, single HTTP request — no special privileges or user interaction needed (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N).
  • Impact: The out-of-range index triggers a CUDA device-side assertion that poisons the GPU context. This corruption is unrecoverable at the process level — all subsequent inference requests fail until the vLLM process is restarted, resulting in a full denial of service for every client sharing that engine instance. Confidentiality and integrity are not affected; the impact is availability-only.

Affected software

  • vllm-project vllm (PyPI package): all versions prior to 0.28.0
  • Fixed in vLLM 0.28.0 (patch adds explicit lower-bound token ID validation, rejecting negative IDs with an HTTP 400 error before they reach the GPU)

Severity

  • CVSS v4.0: 8.7 (High) — CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
  • CVSS v3.1: 7.5 (High) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Mitigation and recommended actions

  • Immediate: Upgrade to vLLM 0.28.0 or later, which validates that token IDs are non-negative before they are used to index the embedding table.
  • If immediate patching is not possible:
    • Deploy a reverse proxy or API gateway in front of vLLM that filters/rejects negative integers in token-ID fields of requests to /v1/embeddings and /pooling.
    • Where possible, restrict these endpoints to accept only string input rather than raw token-ID arrays from untrusted clients.
    • Restrict network access to vLLM’s embeddings/pooling endpoints to trusted internal callers only.
    • Note: process-supervision/auto-restart alone is not an adequate mitigation, since the malicious request can be repeated immediately to re-trigger the crash.

References

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

How IONIX’s External Exposure Management Platform Detects and Validates
Zero-Days to Shrink MTTR

1

Map your entire attack surface (continously)

IONIX uses multi-factor discovery methods, including DNS analysis, certificate mapping, metadata inspection, and more, to automatically map every internet-facing asset across your environment. This includes cloud instances, third-party platforms, shadow IT, and even forgotten infrastructure that traditional tools miss.

2

Monitor for new CVEs

Dozens of threat intel feeds using agentic technology are continuously analyzed to detect the appearance of proof-of-concept code, exploit kits, and indicators of active targeting. IONIX goes further by applying AI to proactively evaluate whether emerging vulnerabilities are likely to be exploited, even before PoCs go public.

3

Identify Potential External Exposures

Not all CVEs matter. IONIX filters vulnerabilities by asking attacker-centric questions: Can it be reached from the internet? Does it require authentication? Is it being exploited in the wild? This dramatically reduces noise and focuses teams on threats that can actually be weaponized.

4

Create Safe, Scalable Exploit Validations

IONIX transforms real-world PoCs into safe, non-intrusive test payloads that can be run in production environments without disruption. These simulations are precisely targeted to the systems that are vulnerable, ensuring rapid validation without unnecessary load.

5

Execute Exploit Validations

By combining context about software stack, versioning, exposure status, and reachability, IONIX ensures that only the right payloads are executed against the right assets, maximizing efficiency and minimizing risk.

6

Drive Fast and Actionable Remediation

Results are routed through integrations with ticketing, SOAR, and SIEM tools. Issues are written in plain language, bundled into remediation clusters, and prioritized based on asset criticality, exploitability, and blast radius. This shortens mean time to remediation (MTTR) and empowers teams to act with confidence.

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

Subscribe to Threat Center RSS

Copy/paste the link below into your preferred RSS reader or follow these instructions to subscribe to Slack alerts.

Get Real-Time CVE Alerts to Your Email

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge