Live Exposure Defense: From CVE to Confirmed Exposure in 12 Hours – See more

New CVE Detected

CVE-2026-64849 – Unauthenticated SSRF via Webhook Redirect Bypass – MLflow < 3.15.0

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge:

Summary

CVE-2026-64849 is a critical Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in MLflow’s webhook delivery mechanism, affecting the unauthenticated POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test endpoint. The endpoint validates a webhook’s original URL but does not re-validate or pin the resolved address once an HTTP redirect is followed, allowing attackers to reach internal services or cloud metadata endpoints and read back the response. The flaw carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.3 (Critical).

Technical details

  • Root cause: _validate_webhook_url() checks only the original, attacker-supplied webhook URL; the delivery logic that actually performs the HTTP request follows redirects and re-resolves hostnames without pinning the previously validated address (time-of-check/time-of-use gap).
  • Trigger conditions: An attacker registers or tests a webhook pointing to a public HTTPS endpoint they control, which passes the initial validation, then responds with a 302 (or similar) redirect to an internal address such as a cloud metadata service (e.g., 169.254.169.254) or localhost.
  • Attack vector: Network, no authentication or privileges required, no user interaction — many default MLflow Tracking Server deployments run without authentication enabled.
  • Impact: The /test endpoint reflects the upstream response status and body back to the caller, producing an unauthenticated full-read SSRF capable of exfiltrating internal service data or cloud metadata (e.g., instance credentials). DNS rebinding can also be used to exploit the same validation gap.

Affected software

  • MLflow versions prior to 3.15.0

Severity

  • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 9.3 (Critical)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Mitigation and recommended actions

  • Immediate: Upgrade MLflow to version 3.15.0 or later, which pins the validated address at connection time.
  • If immediate patching is not possible: Enable authentication on the MLflow Tracking Server (default deployments run unauthenticated), restrict network access to the tracking server and its webhook management API, and block outbound requests from the MLflow host to internal/link-local address ranges (including the 169.254.169.254 metadata address) at the network or egress-filtering layer.

How IONIX identifies potentially affected assets

IONIX matches the following signals against data already collected when it crawled the asset; identifying the technology sends no request beyond that crawl.

  • Page title: MLflow

References

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

How IONIX’s External Exposure Management Platform Detects and Validates
Zero-Days to Shrink MTTR

1

Map your entire attack surface (continously)

IONIX uses multi-factor discovery methods, including DNS analysis, certificate mapping, metadata inspection, and more, to automatically map every internet-facing asset across your environment. This includes cloud instances, third-party platforms, shadow IT, and even forgotten infrastructure that traditional tools miss.

2

Monitor for new CVEs

Dozens of threat intel feeds using agentic technology are continuously analyzed to detect the appearance of proof-of-concept code, exploit kits, and indicators of active targeting. IONIX goes further by applying AI to proactively evaluate whether emerging vulnerabilities are likely to be exploited, even before PoCs go public.

3

Identify Potential External Exposures

Not all CVEs matter. IONIX filters vulnerabilities by asking attacker-centric questions: Can it be reached from the internet? Does it require authentication? Is it being exploited in the wild? This dramatically reduces noise and focuses teams on threats that can actually be weaponized.

4

Create Safe, Scalable Exploit Validations

IONIX transforms real-world PoCs into safe, non-intrusive test payloads that can be run in production environments without disruption. These simulations are precisely targeted to the systems that are vulnerable, ensuring rapid validation without unnecessary load.

5

Execute Exploit Validations

By combining context about software stack, versioning, exposure status, and reachability, IONIX ensures that only the right payloads are executed against the right assets, maximizing efficiency and minimizing risk.

6

Drive Fast and Actionable Remediation

Results are routed through integrations with ticketing, SOAR, and SIEM tools. Issues are written in plain language, bundled into remediation clusters, and prioritized based on asset criticality, exploitability, and blast radius. This shortens mean time to remediation (MTTR) and empowers teams to act with confidence.

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

Subscribe to Threat Center RSS

Copy/paste the link below into your preferred RSS reader or follow these instructions to subscribe to Slack alerts.

Get Real-Time CVE Alerts to Your Email

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge