Live Exposure Defense: From CVE to Confirmed Exposure in 12 Hours – See more

New CVE Detected

CVE-2026-73057 – Denial of Service (Memory Exhaustion) – stoatchat before 0.15.0

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge:

Summary

CVE-2026-73057 is an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability (CWE-400) in stoatchat’s proxy service (January), affecting all versions before 0.15.0. The proxy endpoint fails to validate SVG viewBox dimensions before allocating memory to render fetched images, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to exhaust server memory. The issue carries a CVSS v4.0 score of 8.7 (High); no authentication or user interaction is required to exploit it over the network.

Technical details

  • Root cause: the proxy’s image-decoding logic reads SVG viewBox width/height values and passes them directly to memory allocation routines without any upper bound check.
  • Trigger conditions: an attacker hosts a crafted SVG file with extreme dimensions (e.g., 200000×200000, which can consume roughly 1.4 GB of RAM per request) and submits its URL to the proxy endpoint, which fetches and decodes it.
  • Attack vector: network-based, unauthenticated; the proxy accepts arbitrary attacker-supplied URLs and downloads/decodes their content as images.
  • Impact: sending multiple concurrent requests referencing such SVGs can exhaust available memory across all proxy replicas, resulting in denial of service.

Affected software

  • stoatchat (January proxy service): all versions before 0.15.0

Severity

  • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 7.5 (High) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • CVSS v4.0 Score: 8.7 (High) — CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Mitigation and recommended actions

  • Immediate: upgrade stoatchat to version 0.15.0 or later, which caps SVG dimension values before allocating memory during image decoding in the proxy.
  • If no patch can be applied immediately: restrict or monitor outbound proxy fetch requests, rate-limit or throttle concurrent proxy requests per client, and consider disabling or restricting the image-proxy endpoint until the fix is deployed.

References

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

How IONIX’s External Exposure Management Platform Detects and Validates
Zero-Days to Shrink MTTR

1

Map your entire attack surface (continously)

IONIX uses multi-factor discovery methods, including DNS analysis, certificate mapping, metadata inspection, and more, to automatically map every internet-facing asset across your environment. This includes cloud instances, third-party platforms, shadow IT, and even forgotten infrastructure that traditional tools miss.

2

Monitor for new CVEs

Dozens of threat intel feeds using agentic technology are continuously analyzed to detect the appearance of proof-of-concept code, exploit kits, and indicators of active targeting. IONIX goes further by applying AI to proactively evaluate whether emerging vulnerabilities are likely to be exploited, even before PoCs go public.

3

Identify Potential External Exposures

Not all CVEs matter. IONIX filters vulnerabilities by asking attacker-centric questions: Can it be reached from the internet? Does it require authentication? Is it being exploited in the wild? This dramatically reduces noise and focuses teams on threats that can actually be weaponized.

4

Create Safe, Scalable Exploit Validations

IONIX transforms real-world PoCs into safe, non-intrusive test payloads that can be run in production environments without disruption. These simulations are precisely targeted to the systems that are vulnerable, ensuring rapid validation without unnecessary load.

5

Execute Exploit Validations

By combining context about software stack, versioning, exposure status, and reachability, IONIX ensures that only the right payloads are executed against the right assets, maximizing efficiency and minimizing risk.

6

Drive Fast and Actionable Remediation

Results are routed through integrations with ticketing, SOAR, and SIEM tools. Issues are written in plain language, bundled into remediation clusters, and prioritized based on asset criticality, exploitability, and blast radius. This shortens mean time to remediation (MTTR) and empowers teams to act with confidence.

Are you exposed?

Get a free report of your organization’s exposure to this CVE and threat

Subscribe to Threat Center RSS

Copy/paste the link below into your preferred RSS reader or follow these instructions to subscribe to Slack alerts.

Get Real-Time CVE Alerts to Your Email

Be the first to know when new zero-days emerge